Quality of Life Hot and Continuing Topics including Parks

Presented by Hyde Park-Kenwood Community Conference, a Chicago neighborhood association, and Hyde Park's premier website hydepark.org.
We work toward an attractive, secure, diverse, caring, and participatory, connected community.
Join the Conference! Your dues help us conserve and improve our community. Reach us at hpkcc@aol.com.
Writer Gary Ossewaarde

Return links: Home. Hot Topics home. Site contents.
The other Hot Topics Community Issues sections: Accessibility. Affordability. Development Projects.
Schools. University of Chicago

Quality of life is a big and diffuse subject. Hyde Parkers love to complain, especially that Hyde Park as they knew it is going down the drain, while at the same time extolling the community as unique and certainly the best in the world. Best of worlds and worst of worlds. And they've been doing that since the 19th century, or at least the battle over annexation to Chicago and the evolution of many Hyde Parks. Of course, there is real basis for both views. And the emphasis partly depends on one's memories and one's vision of Hyde's future, and what would "fix" things. Short looks at quality issues can be found in Quality and in the Tracking Community Trends pages. Observation: Many of the things that become "news" then quickly dive off the radar are quality issues. So are many things that don't make the news but stand behind what happens or long term trends, like shadows lost in sun. And strongly voiced objection to changes or proposals are often based on expected or feared impact on quality of life or neighborhood or block character.

Some "quality" matters that are "hot" at least to parts of the community.

(Have you noticed.... Dog droppings has improved, partly due to enforcement?)

State of 53rd Street. Too many vacant properties; too chopped up by open or non retail space; too many one or two story buildings; too many really old and obsolete and not kept t up and unattractive; rent too high; some businesses don't make the looks and service appealing to customers; street scape etc. get fixed up but soon look ground down again; lots of homeless and visitors from other areas, too many franchise or non unique businesses, Lake Park and Harper Court with too low land uses and not used to take advantage of nearby transit as well as opportunities for height, density, larger businesses and (Lake Park) as an auto-oriented street (and in poor shape for drivers or walkers), limited parking.

But counterpoints are often cited--low scale and low pace (with just enough exceptions like HP Bank), local and unusual businesses and restaurants that really know how to niche or take advantage of a very diverse clientele, city designation as a pedestrian friendly and transit oriented neighborhood street. Many of the expenditures of the TIF such as on streetscape, business facade and improvement, and hiring CARA/Cleanslate were intended address concerns about quality.

Likewise demand for enforcement of general neighborhood quality standards were behind complaints by organizations and residents about scaffolding on the Harper Theater or the teardown lots at 53rd McMobil and 53rd Cornell or those that have led to various improvement efforts with the Metra stations, viaducts and raised right-of-way, and some parks They also spurred as various gardening projects around the neighborhood (53rd Lake Park being one). Likewise, some of the arguments to either save or get rid of Harper Court and Hyde Park Co-Op were really about what makes quality.